1.0 → 1.8
StatBrand & Creativity
Creative commitment scales business effects almost linearly
Creative commitment - the combination of campaign duration, number of media and budget - scales business effects almost linearly: campaigns scoring 12-15 on Hurman & Field's commitment scale average 1.8 very large business effects against 1.0 for those scoring 3-7.
Source
System1 x IPA, The Power of Compound Creativity (2025)
Andrew Tindall (System1)
Hurman & Field, Creative Commitment (2020), IPA Effectiveness Award entries 2012-2018, via The Power of Compound Creativity, s. 28
Go to the originalMore from this source
StatConsistent brands' ads get better every year - inconsistent brands' ads get worseStatAd distinctiveness compounds only for consistent brandsStatConsistency more than doubles what a point of ESOV buysStatThe most consistent brands create nearly five times the brand effectsStatHigh-consistency brands report very large profit growth six times more oftenStatThe most consistent brands earn four times the advertising ROIWarningNo inconsistent brand grew distinctiveness - noneStatBrands that keep their agency create measurably better advertising every yearPrincipleAgency tenure predicts effectiveness - CMO tenure does notStatConsistent creative foundations multiply every brand effect, up to seven-foldStatAds wear in, not out: longer-lived campaigns build recognition fasterCaseAdding radio and OOH lifted Meta CTR by 86% at stable spend